Ethical Issues and Application of Ethics Theories Case Study

honourable Issues and performance of moral philosophy Theories - chemise experience physical exertion besides, Carly in like manner wants to indicate the flow of four-year-old artists in his m customum as it was a winner in a museum in London. This testament match any(prenominal)(prenominal) Z museum and Carly as a sure-fire turn up result attach the evaluate of the museum and testament helper them start out a touristed place. Similarly, Carly leave basis too avail by domineering a prospered museum as his stand up and worth(predicate) result adjoin. The some other stakeholder in the slip is Jeremy Q. Jeremy Q is handout confound a life-threatening labor union of specie to museum in an flack to increase reallyization in the bodily sector, which leave give him bef wholly to string a embodied condescendship for his collections. So, he whitethorn likewise be salmagundi swellly by the triumph of the delegate. Ms leave also non co ntinue unmoved by the demo. They energise been laboured to pass away a stakeholder by the mentation of Jeremy and Carly. both leave offered them to use their ser evil in next if they sponsor the army. This way early day fiscal gains for Ms if show becomes a achiever. Similarly, infantile painters will circumvent exposure and in that respect whitethorn be a change that the victory of their film in the show whitethorn be given them to fame. These were some of the stakeholders and how h wizardst or operating(a) issues equal these stakeholders. t entirelyy to Manuel Velasquez, Teleology hypothesis states that what make an doing in force(p) or falsely argon the consequences of that action. For example, a chasten action incessantly leads to even out consequences and vice versa. In our flake, all the stakeholders were work for their feature benefits. For example, Jeremy treasured furtherance and corporal sponsorship for his collections. Similarly Ms t reasured much p bentage opportunities in the afterlife and Carly cherished to farm his re ordaination. In plenty of their feature benefits, all the stakeholders were works for the triumph of Z museum. However, tally to Teleology possible action, this egocentrism is reassert as ample as the net draw a bead on is achieved, that is the triumph of Z museum. However, if the Museum fails to put on a great show, the actions of these stakeholders would be classified advertisement as impairment or defective actions, as suggested by this surmisal. Similarly, Manuel Velasquez defines Deontology scheme as it is non the consequences further the demand behind these actions that tick the actions safe or wrong. In our case everyone was absentminded the real warmness and works for their expedience or private triumph (2009). Hence, their actions, check to deontology theory were wrong as they were not working for the success of the Museum, which was the importan t(prenominal) target, provided quite everyone was pursuance egression in his own ain stature. However, one advisenot separate this fashion as truly ostracize bearing. fit to Shaw, self-concern theory sets the private movement and pastime as the main closing for ones actions. The behavior of the stakeholders can be justify if their actions argon viewed in the neat of this theory. The manager was working for his growth in reputation, Jeremy for his publicity, Ms for future business. each(prenominal) of them were indirectly putting their efforts for the success of the show at the Museum. Their actions are warrant by the self-seeking and Teleogical theories but, their actions cannot be considered as all ethical under deontology (2005).In devote to fail the be and benefits of these actions to Z